Resources:
  • STUDENTS
  • ALUMNI
  • FACULTY
  • STAFF
  • LIBRARY
Cooley Law School
MENU
  • ABOUT
      • Mission, Values, and Vision
      • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
      • Home of the National Legal Mentoring Consortium
      • Commitment to Social Justice and Access
      • Leadership & Administration
      • Blog
      • Campus Locations
      • Title IX and Campus Safety
      • Media Requests
      • Consumer Information
      • Jobs
  • J.D.
      • J.D. Program
      • Prospective Students
      • Apply Now
      • Tuition & Financial Aid
      • Scholarships
      • FAQ
      • Contact Admissions
      • Campus Locations
      • Course Catalog
      • Schedule Options
      • Study Abroad
      • Our Student Body
      • Academic Calendar
  • LL.M.
      • LL.M. Programs
      • Apply Now
      • Tuition & Financial Aid
      • Scholarships
      • FAQ
      • Contact Admissions
      • Corporate Law & Finance
      • Tax Law
      • Homeland & National Security
      • U.S. Legal Studies for Foreign Attorneys
  • EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING
      • Social Justice Clinics
      • Community Service Clinics
      • Externships
      • Simulation Courses
      • Competitions
  • MAKE A GIFT
      • Giving Tuesday 2021
      • Annual Fund
      • DEI Champions
      • Merit Scholarship Fund
      • Planned Giving
      • Cooley Society Membership
      • Donor Honor Roll
  • LIBRARY

Search

WMU-Cooley Faculty Expert Analysis on Rittenhouse Verdict

Following the not-guilty verdict of Kyle Rittenhouse on November 19, 2021, WMU-Cooley Law School Criminal Law Professors Jeffrey Swartz and Anthony Flores were interviewed by media in Michigan and Florida.

Swartz_thumbnail3

Rittenhouse, whose attorneys claimed his actions were in self-defense, was on trial in Kenosha, Wisconsin, for shooting three individuals and killing two of them during protests that followed the police shooting of Jacob Blake.

During an interview with WILX TV, Swartz said he was surprised by the verdict, which came after 26 hours of jury deliberations.

“If they had come back the first day, I would’ve said ‘not guilt’ because of the quick verdict,” said Swartz. “The fact that they took four days to get to where they were surprises me that it was not either a hung jury or some form of a guilty verdict.”

Swartz also spoke about the consequences the verdict may have moving forward.

“My concern is that this gives license to people to go anywhere in the country, anytime they want, and become a vigilante protecting people that they don’t even know,” said Swartz, who is a former Miami-Dade judge, defense attorney, and prosecutor.

flores_thumbnailWhile being interviewed by WZZM TV, Flores said the jury had to determine whether or not Rittenhouse was believable during his testimony that he had to protect himself because he thought his life was in peril.

"Many times juries are the ones who are there watching the witness’ demeanor and testimony and they come back with a decision to find who's credible. It's obvious this deliberation took so long that they had real struggles with some of the witnesses versions for the prosecutor, indicating this was done intentionally, premeditatedly or deliberately using lethal force for a reason that he was actually being pursued or felt he was in peril before he felt the need to pull the trigger on that automatic weapon."

Swartz told Tampa’s ABC Action News that he believes “the judge put his thumb on the scale of justice in favor of Mr. Rittenhouse,” while speaking about the judge defending his ruling that prosecutors do not call those shots by Rittenhouse victims. “I think his rulings were wrong. I think anyone who is shot and killed whether it turns out to be justified or whether it turns out to be excused is still the victim of a gunshot and is still the victim of a homicide."

Flores, a former assistant prosecutor, told Tampa Bay 10 News that he “respects the jury’s verdict. I just don’t know what the consequences are. There’s going to be a lot of commentary on the consequences of the trial.”

More WMU-Cooley Faculty Experts

Tags: Faculty Experts
Back to Blog
  • Tweet

Related Articles

Chanelle Manus: Playing the Field in the NFL and Sports Law

WMU-Cooley graduate Chanelle Manus grew up watching a lot of sports on TV, mostly because she knew...
Read More

Law School After Military Service: A Student Success Story

As a former U.S. Marine Staff Sgt., Victor Flores knows the meaning of commitment. As a WMU-Cooley...
Read More

Contract Law With A Florida Twist

Professors Turn Focus to Practical Bar Passage Help As a way to assist Florida bar passage efforts,...
Read More

Subscribe to Email Updates

Recent Posts

Posts by Topic

  • WMU-Cooley Faculty (118)
  • WMU-Cooley Alumni (111)
  • Legal Education (75)
  • WMU-Cooley Students (55)
  • Faculty Experts (49)
  • Tampa Bay Campus (24)
  • Diversity (18)
  • From Where I Stand (18)
  • Awards (13)
  • Military Students (11)
  • Study Abroad (11)
  • Innocence Project (10)
  • Plain language (8)
  • Multicultural Lawyering (6)
  • Weekend Program (6)
  • Lansing Campus (4)
  • Legal Ethics (4)
  • Bar Exam Advice (3)
  • Externships (3)
  • International Law Faculty Experts (3)
  • Resiliency (3)
  • Equal Access to Justice (2)
  • Kimberly O'Leary (2)
  • Library Blog Series (2)
  • online learning (2)
  • Continuous Improvement (1)
  • Cooley Law School History (1)
  • Homeland & National Security Law Review (1)
  • LL.M. (1)
  • LSAT Prep (1)
  • Service & Integrity (1)
  • WMU-Cooley Career Office (1)
  • WMU-Cooley Mission (1)
see all
Western Michigan University Cooley Law School

CONTACT
WMU-Cooley Law School
300 South Capitol Avenue
Lansing, Michigan 48933 
(517) 371-5140

Contact Us

Contact Admissions

Read Our Blog

Full Sitemap

Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

Consumer Information

In corde hominum est anima legis.

Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School is an independent, private, non-profit educational institution affiliated with Western Michigan University. The affiliation between WMU and WMU-Cooley, which are legally and financially independent institutions, will end on or before November 5, 2023. As an independent institution, the Law School is solely responsible for its academic program. Accredited by the American Bar Association and the Higher Learning Commission. 

Read non-discrimination policy

If you encounter accessibility barriers while on our website, please notify our Accessibility Office using the Inaccessible Content Notification Form.

© 2022 Cooley Law School
Designed By InVerve Marketing