Resources:
  • STUDENTS
  • ALUMNI
  • FACULTY
  • STAFF
  • LIBRARY
Cooley Law School
MENU
  • ABOUT
      • Mission, Values, and Vision
      • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
      • Home of the National Legal Mentoring Consortium
      • Commitment to Social Justice and Access
      • Leadership & Administration
      • Blog
      • Campus Locations
      • Title IX and Campus Safety
      • Media Requests
      • Consumer Information
      • Jobs
  • J.D.
      • J.D. Program
      • Prospective Students
      • Apply Now
      • Tuition & Financial Aid
      • Scholarships
      • FAQ
      • Contact Admissions
      • Campus Locations
      • Course Catalog
      • Schedule Options
      • Study Abroad
      • Our Student Body
      • Academic Calendar
      • U.S. Legal Studies for Foreign Attorneys
  • EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING
      • Social Justice Clinics
      • Community Service Clinics
      • Externships
      • Simulation Courses
      • Competitions
  • MAKE A GIFT
      • Giving Tuesday 2021
      • Annual Fund
      • DEI Champions
      • Merit Scholarship Fund
      • Planned Giving
      • Cooley Society Membership
      • Donor Honor Roll
  • LIBRARY

Search

The Importance of the First Year of Law School

Blog author WMU-Cooley Distinguished Professor Emeritus Otto Stockmeyer devoted 35 years to teaching first-year law courses. In an update of a 2017 blog post he offers his thoughts on the important role of the first year in training successful lawyers.

Forty-some years ago the Dean of Harvard Law School told first-year law student Scott Turow, author of the book One L, “Almost all attorneys regard the first year of law school as the most challenging year of their legal lives.” It remains so today.

One reason the first year is such a challenge is that, in addition to imparting legal doctrine and lawyering skills, it introduces students to two foundational concepts: the common law and legal reasoning.

What is meant by “common law?” The common law, which we inherited from England, is simply the accumulation of judicial precedent based on the inherent power of the courts to declare law where no statute or constitutional provision controls.

The common law of a jurisdiction develops on a case-by-case basis, with legal issues decided as particular legal problems arise. The addition of the doctrine of stare decisis provides some predictability to the common law, although as Roscoe Pound famously wrote: “The law must be stable, but it cannot stand still.”

U.S. District Court Judge Avern Cohn was right in saying, at a lecture at the University of Michigan law school, “the vast majority of the law that governs us is the common law, judge-made law.”

Regardless of the debate over whether we have a “living” Constitution, the common law remains alive and evolutionary. Rule-of-law candidates for appellate judgeships who maintain that the judicial branch “should interpret the law and not make the law” have lost sight of our common-law heritage.

What is “legal reasoning?” As beginning law students soon learn, what we call legal reasoning can be expressed in a formula known as IRAC. The law’s version of the deductive syllogism, it stands for Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. First, identify the issue (“Is Socrates mortal?”). Then state the applicable rule (“All men are mortal”). Then apply the rule to the relevant facts (“Socrates is a man”). Which leads inexorably to the conclusion (“Therefore Socrates is mortal”).

Some law students have the idea that IRAC is just a law school exam-writing format. The reality is much different. IRAC is what “thinking like a lawyer” is all about. It is the template used by lawyers in preparing legal memoranda, and the structure that most judges use in drafting judicial opinions. It’s also the type of analysis that bar examiners are looking for.

IRAC is as central to legal analysis as the formula E=mc2 is to physics. The article The Importance of IRAC and Legal Writing rightly concludes: “IRAC is the key to success on law school exams, the bar exam, and a successful career in litigation.”

Key to mastering common-law synthesis and legal reasoning is the Socratic method of teaching. Supplanted by more experiential teaching in the second and third years, the Socratic method is still a mainstay of first-year courses. Some beginning students dread the Socratic method due to a fear of standing to recite in a room full of strangers. Instead they should embrace the experience.

Conclusion. In the movie version of The Paper Chase, Professor Kingsfield analogizes first-year law teaching to doing brain surgery: “You teach yourselves the law, but I train your mind. You come in here with a skull full of mush, and you leave thinking like a lawyer.”

With access to a law library, any reasonably intelligent college grad can learn basic legal rules and procedures. But it takes immersion in the first year of law school to develop the legal mindset necessary to successfully practice law.

For more of his views on this topic, see Professor Stockmeyer's article “Reflections on Teaching the First Day of Contracts,” available through the Social Science Research Network.

More Blogs By Professor Stockmeyer

Tags: WMU-Cooley Students, WMU-Cooley Faculty
Back to Blog
  • Tweet

Related Articles

The importance of the first year of law school

Blog author WMU-Cooley Distinguished Professor Emeritus Otto Stockmeyer devoted 35 years to...
Read More

The Study of Remedies, Law's Cure for Wrongdoing, is in Declining Health.

I have previously blogged about the unfortunate case of Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal. In a poll of...
Read More

Contracts quintessential first-year course: Law school professor makes his case

Blog author WMU-Cooley Distinguished Professor Emeritus Otto Stockmeyer presented a paper at an...
Read More

Subscribe to Email Updates

Recent Posts

Posts by Topic

  • WMU-Cooley Faculty (121)
  • WMU-Cooley Alumni (115)
  • Legal Education (76)
  • WMU-Cooley Students (58)
  • Faculty Experts (52)
  • Tampa Bay Campus (25)
  • Diversity (20)
  • From Where I Stand (18)
  • Awards (13)
  • Military Students (11)
  • Study Abroad (11)
  • Innocence Project (10)
  • Plain language (9)
  • Multicultural Lawyering (7)
  • Weekend Program (6)
  • Lansing Campus (5)
  • Library Blog Series (5)
  • Cooley Law School History (4)
  • Legal Ethics (4)
  • Bar Exam Advice (3)
  • Externships (3)
  • International Law Faculty Experts (3)
  • Resiliency (3)
  • Equal Access to Justice (2)
  • Kimberly O'Leary (2)
  • Service & Integrity (2)
  • online learning (2)
  • Continuous Improvement (1)
  • Homeland & National Security Law Review (1)
  • LL.M. (1)
  • LSAT Prep (1)
  • WMU-Cooley Career Office (1)
  • WMU-Cooley Mission (1)
see all
Western Michigan University Cooley Law School

CONTACT
WMU-Cooley Law School
300 South Capitol Avenue
Lansing, Michigan 48933 
(517) 371-5140

Contact Us

Contact Admissions

Read Our Blog

Full Sitemap

Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

Consumer Information

In corde hominum est anima legis.

Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School is an independent, private, non-profit educational institution affiliated with Western Michigan University. The affiliation between WMU and WMU-Cooley, which are legally and financially independent institutions, will end on or before November 5, 2023. As an independent institution, the Law School is solely responsible for its academic program. Accredited by the American Bar Association and the Higher Learning Commission. 

Read non-discrimination policy

If you encounter accessibility barriers while on our website, please notify our Accessibility Office using the Inaccessible Content Notification Form.

© 2023 Cooley Law School
Designed By InVerve Marketing